CMS Holds Beneficiary Sessions on Competitive Bidding

August 27th, 2010

WATERLOO, Iowa—VGM reported last week that CMS is holding training sessions on the competitive bidding program for beneficiaries.

“It is extremely important that beneficiaries and hospital discharge officials (referral sources) attend these sessions and ask questions regarding the impact of the program,” a legislative update from the member services group said.

“According to a DME provider in Kansas City,” the update read, “a recent CMS training session in his area was ‘well intended, but not well received’ by area discharge planners and social workers. The provider indicated that several key referral sources are ‘up in arms’ about the program and concerned about access.”

HME “We’re here to Serve”

August 12th, 2010

A home medical care service group based out of Iowa has launched a campaign to stress the importance of home medical care by introducing several YouTube videos that feature HME users sharing their testimony about the HME care they receive. The beneficiaries also address the drastic changes competitive bidding will have on their quality of life if the project goes into effect as planned on Jan. 1, 2011.

For more information visit http://homecaremag.com/topics/competitive-bidding/hme-beneficiary-videos-20100809/

Coping with the Monster Under the Bed

July 22nd, 2010

Bedtime can be one of the most frightening moments of the day for a child.  It is important to find ways to help your child relax and feel safe enough to be able to sleep – here is a fantastic article with tips and ideas to remedy any nighttime woes that you and your child may encounter. For example, if your child is afraid of the dark, playing games at night such as flashlight tag or a glow-in-the-dark scavenger hunt are wonderful activities that endow children with a sense of comfort in the dark, which in turn can help them relax at bedtime. Try some of the tips with your child so that you all can rest easy.

Sleep Apnea and Teen Academic Performance | National Sleep Foundation – Information on Sleep Health and Safety

July 15th, 2010

Just in time as you start thinking about going back to school. Give your teen a fresh start this school year by having him or her tested for Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Sleep Apnea and Teen Academic Performance | National Sleep Foundation – Information on Sleep Health and Safety.

Respira Medical was featured in HME NEWS!

June 30th, 2010

The Technology Special Report article discusses the challenges faced in maintaining patient follow-up, the need to track sleep patient outcomes and replenishment CPAP supplies. In 2005, Respira implemented medSage’s OSA Patient Management Application, which places automated calls or, starting this year, emails – inquiring about the patient’s compliance, any issues with therapy and notifying them of their eligibility for new supplies. Referral sources appreciate the outcome data and compliance information. This technology is a “crucial” business partner benefiting Respira, its patients, and their physicians.

Sleep Study in Lab vs. Home

June 3rd, 2010

Below is a brief from HME News on new research concerning in-home sleep studies.

In brief: Study compares sleep success rates
05.21.2010

PHILADELPHIA – New research indicates that patients who get tested for sleep apnea in their homes do as well on CPAP therapy as patients who get tested in labs. Researchers at the Philadelphia VA Medical Center conducted a two-site study with nearly 300 randomized patients who underwent either standard in-laboratory sleep-testing or at-home testing. Of the 223 patients who started CPAP treatment after evaluation, 185 completed three months of follow-up. Average hours of daily use over the three-month period were similar between the two groups. “One of the biggest and most insurmountable barriers to treatment is the need for overnight testing in a sleep laboratory,” stated Dr. Samuel Kuna, chief of pulmonary, critical care and sleep at the center. “Our research suggests that this may no longer be mandatory for diagnosis.”

Remote or in-home sleep testing is an alternative to in-hospital laboratory sleep testing. In-home sleep testing can be used to diagnosis Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) for individuals who have a history of loud chronic snoring, are identified as high-risk using a scientifically validated sleep survey such as the Epworth Sleepiness scale or have other health factors such as obesity, high blood pressure, or diabetes. Click here for more information on Respira Medical’s Portable Sleep Studies.

Recent News: AAHomecare Introduces Code of Ethics

May 24th, 2010

The following discusses the new code of business ethics of the American Association for Homecare. The original article can be viewed here:  http://homecaremag.com/news/aahomecare-introductes-code-of-ethics-20100518/

AAHomecare Introduces Code of Ethics
LAS VEGAS—At a May 12 meeting during Medtrade Spring, the American Association for Homecare previewed its new Code of Business Ethics. According to the group, the code was developed “to highlight and promote the high standards practiced by home care providers, and demonstrates this sector’s commitment to honest and transparent business practices.”

The nation’s new health reform law (the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, or PPACA) mandates adoption of compliance plans for health care providers, and the new code should help comply with those requirements, officials said.

The code states that association members will:

• Comply with applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations;
• Promote and encourage conduct that builds trust between members, patients, referral sources and private and public-sector payers;
• Provide prompt and reliable home care products and services, appropriate for each individual’s needs, health and safety; and
• Encourage and promote ethical business practices and shall refrain from offering unlawful inducements in order to influence business.

To view AAHomecare’s Code of Business Ethics, see www.aahomecare.org/CodeofEthics.

Learn more about Respira’s Compliance Program here.

Latest News on Competitive Bidding

May 11th, 2010

Here is an article from HomeCareMag.com with the latest news on competitive bidding

“CBO Releases Score for H.R. 3790; Can Industry Pay the Bill?

WASHINGTON—After months of waiting, the home medical equipment industry finally got the figure it was looking for last week when the Congressional Budget Office released its score for H.R. 3790, the bill that would eliminate DMEPOS competitive bidding.
The bottom line: The CBO says a repeal of the program would cost $9.6 billion over 10 years.”

Read the rest of the article here.


FYI on Home Medical Products

May 6th, 2010

Check out this article we stumbled upon on Home Medical Products. Original article can be found here.

Home Medical Products: Why They Are Exorbitant

By Larry Berk and Delaney La Rosa, R.N. | Apr 23, 2010

Our Healthcare Consumer Explains Why Home Medical Products Are Exorbitant

Keith is a wheelchair user who writes that he is appalled at the prices often charged for items supplied to the disabled. As an example, a replacement battery charger for his power wheelchair was billed at over $480 and he was personally responsible for paying over 30% of the price with the insurance company paying the remainder. Keith didn’t say if this was billed to his private insurance company or if he was a Medicare beneficiary, but he thought that the right price should have been in total the amount he had to pay, $160.

Keith, the Healthcare Consumer couldn’t agree with you more. But before we offer our opinion, in the interests of full disclosure, we should tell you that one member of the Healthcare Consumer team runs VidaCura, a company that sells these kinds of items.  Nevertheless, you’ll find our perspective interesting and considering the national dialog on healthcare, very relevant.

First of all, Keith, you’re talking about the area of healthcare that is referred to as “Home Medical Equipment” or “Durable Medical Equipment”, or DME / HME for short. HME products include walkers, wheelchairs, oxygen supply devices, scooters, things to make trips to the bathroom easier, hospital beds used at home and the like.

Let us introduce the participants in this drama:

A Medicare Beneficiary might be you, Keith or someone else who qualifies for participation in Medicare, etc.  By the way, people assume that just because you are using Medicare that everything is covered including all HME. This is not true. There has to be a proven medical need, CMS-imposed conditions must be met and even in cases where the need is proven, generally the beneficiary must pay a percentage of the price. (We could write an entire other column on those late night TV commercials that promise to get you a power scooter for free!)

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) is the federal agency that administers the Medicare, Medicaid and CHIP health insurance programs. CMS produces a fee schedule that lists the items they will pay for and what they will pay (“reimburse”) for each of those items.  This fee schedule is public information. You can download and look it over here if you have Microsoft Excel. CMS also sets the rules that all medical providers including doctors and HME dealers must abide by if they desire to accept Medicare/Medicaid patients. One important and relevant rule to this column says that if you are a Medicare provider, you may not sell a particular item to anyone for less than Medicare pays.  Put another way, CMS sets the “floor” price for all HME items. As you can guess, because of the massive scope and size of the Medicare program, it influences most other areas of healthcare.

The HME manufacturers and dealers who make, sell and then deliver durable medical equipment to homes and medical facilities across America. When a manufacturer produces a new product or device, they lobby CMS first, for their new item to be paid for by Medicare in the first place. And then, if CMS consents to that, then they lobby for a fee schedule price. (Are you as tired as we are of hearing about lobbying?) As for the dealers, most HME dealers are so heavily dependent on Medicare that following CMS rules and accepting Medicare payment rates for the most part, govern how they run their businesses.

Health insurance companies like Aetna, United Healthcare, Blue Cross, etc. have their own fee schedules as to what they’ll pay. There are two things you need to know about insurance company fee schedules. The first thing is that if we’re talking about an item that appears on the Medicare fee schedule, the insurance company must pay more. It must be this way because since most HME dealers also accept Medicare, they cannot sell to a private insurance company for less. The second thing you need to know about insurance company fee schedules is that they are secret.  Insurance companies don’t want you to know what they pay. Lastly, they can and often do change the rules about coverage for HME on the fly leaving the insured to pay a percentage of what the insurance company paid instead of a flat co-payment.

So let’s compare business models:

In the healthcare model:

A power wheelchair manufacturer decides to market an extra battery charger as an accessory or if the original one is lost or broken. They lobby CMS to allow their product to be reimbursable and then to convince them to make the reimbursement rate as high as they can. They do this ostensibly for several reasons; first because then they can charge the HME dealer more for the item and secondly, on behalf of the HME dealer, the price needs to be high to make up for the fact that the federal government often takes an inordinately long time to pay its bills.

Then, by law, private insurance companies set their price for that same item, making sure that its even higher than the Medicare fee schedule price but we don’t know how much higher for sure. What we do know is that if the prices are too high, the insurance company simply raises the premium charge to your employer possibly risking your job or future raise and you will need to pay 20-40% of [a much higher] secret number.
A not-so-hypothetical free market model:

A laptop computer manufacturer decides to market an extra battery charger as an accessory or if the original one is lost or broken. Their marketing people meet with one or more of their dealers and collectively make some guesses as to what the consumer would pay for it presuming that the dealer makes a reasonable profit and agrees to all the other terms including how fast they will pay the manufacturer.

Together, they bring it to market and the consumer sees it on the shelf. If the consumer believes the price represents a reasonable value, they buy it and everybody is happy. If the consumer doesn’t think it’s a fair price, then one or more of the following things happen:  the manufacturer stops making it; the dealer stop selling it, they lower its price if they can or another manufacturer steps in and makes one available at a lower price.

So there you have it Keith. While the Healthcare Consumer is a staunch believer in universal healthcare as a moral imperative for all Americans, even with the recently passed reform there is more work to be done. That so many are claiming that the reform package doesn’t do enough to control costs is true. But it’s not just a matter of weeding out inefficiencies. The process needs to be re-engineered.  The Healthcare Consumer has an answer. We believe that if health care consumers (that would be all of us) are given the tools to be intelligent shoppers, including price visibility and information to allow intelligent choices to be made that they will be encouraged to do what they already do for big screen televisions and digital cameras.  Lastly, if you really want to change buyer behavior, change the system so that the consumer has skin in the game.

By the way, VidaCura doesn’t accept Medicare so they don’t have to be encumbered by the minimum pricing rules. Larry believes that if an item is priced to represent good value in the first place, that most consumers will do the math and realize that the price is in line with whatever the percentage of a much higher price that they would have had to pay if Medicare or an insurance company were involved.

The Healthcare Consumer is written by Larry Berk and Delaney La Rosa,RN,  healthcare and insurance professionals with over 25 years of combined experience. Larry is the President of VidaCura, Inc. a health and wellness products company. VidaCura can be found online at www.vidacura.com. Delaney has been a healthcare professional for more than 18 years with a background in healthcare fraud investigation and is a registered nurse. Got a question, comment or suggestion for a column? Write to them at thehealthcareconsumer@yahoo.com.

FYI: Policy Changes for CPAP Providers

April 13th, 2010

Here at Respira Medical, we keep our ear to the ground when it comes to changes in healthcare policies and procedures. With all of the  regulatory changes in healthcare and Medicare policy, we like to keep our customer s  and clients informed about happenings in the industry. The following article was posted on the HME News website earlier this month.

Medicare Ups Ante for CPAPs
By Theresa Flaherty Managing Editor

BALTIMORE – Just when CPAP providers thought CMS couldn’t possibly impose more documentation requirements on them, the DME MACs last week began enforcing new local coverage determinations.

As of April 1, four specific coverage requirements must be documented by the physician before the provider can move a patient from a CPAP (E0601) to a bi-level machine. Previously, it was enough to show that the beneficiary tried and was unsuccessful with attempts using the CPAP device. In addition to that, physicians now must also document that:

  • Multiple interface options have been tried and the current interface is most comfortable to the beneficiary; and
  • The work of exhalation with the current pressure setting of the E0601 prevents the beneficiary from tolerating the therapy; and
  • Lower pressure settings of the E0601 fail to adequately control the symptoms of OSA or reduce the AHI/RDI to acceptable levels.

It’s another example of “good medicine, bad policy,” stakeholders say. “It’s hard enough to get physicians to document things like ‘hey, the patient feels better,’ much less get them to document things related to pressure relief,” said Kelly Riley, director of The MED Group’s National Respiratory Network. “Certainly, the sleep doctors and pulmonologists understand the things related to expiratory pressure, but I’m not sure that’s the case with all primary care practitioners. That’s an awful lot to ask.”

Another concern for providers: Many times, the patient fails on standard CPAP in the sleep lab, but the physician still must document all four requirements before the provider can put the patient on a Bi-Level. “How do we know what happens in a sleep lab?” said Helen Kent, president of Progressive Medical in Carlsbad, Calif. “The doctor calls or the lab calls with a Bi-Level referral but then the onus is on us to find out what they did in the lab. Lots of times we get the sleep report, but it isn’t thorough enough.”

The policy change gave providers only about three weeks to educate physicians on the changes, but provider Todd Cressler was on top of it. “We have the handouts going out already to all the referral sources to let them enjoy the further requirements of going from PAP to Bi-Level,” said Cressler, president/CEO of Harrisburg, Pa.-based CressCare Medical. “The physicians are not going to be happy but we’re just following the rules.” These latest requirements, on top of those that went into effect in November of 2008, could be the final straw for many providers, who find it too cumbersome–and expensive–to continue serving Medicare beneficiaries. “Medicare is making things so hard you are going to have more people say ‘I am just not going to do this anymore,’” said Kent.

If you have any questions or concerns regarding this article, feel free to contact us or join our discussion on facebook.